MIDAS Project Publication Abstracts

Zimmerman, M., Mattia, J.I. & Posternak, M.A. Are subjects in pharmacological treatment trials of depression representative of patients in routine clinical practice. American Journal of  Psychiatry, 2002, 159, 469-473.

Objective: The methods used in studies establishing the efficacy of antidepressant medications are at variance from how depression is treated in routine clinical practice. In particular, the rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria used to select subjects for participation in efficacy studies potentially limits the generalizability of the results of these trials. It is currently unknown how much impact these inclusion and exclusion criteria have on the representativeness of subjects treated in efficacy trials. The goal of the present study was to determine how many depressed patients treated in routine clinical practice would meet standard inclusion and exclusion criteria for an efficacy trial. Method: Eight hundred and three individuals aged 16 to 65 presenting for an intake appointment at a general psychiatric outpatient practice underwent a thorough diagnostic evaluation that included the administration of semi-structured diagnostic interviews. Three hundred forty-six patients had a current major depressive episode. Common inclusion and exclusion criteria used in efficacy studies of antidepressants were applied to the depressed patients to determine the percentage that would have qualified for an efficacy trial. Results: Approximately one-sixth of the 346 depressed patients would have been excluded from an efficacy trial because they had a bipolar or psychotic subtype of depression. In the remaining 293 outpatients with nonpsychotic, unipolar major depressive disorder, the presence of a comorbid psychiatric disorder, insufficient severity of depressive symptoms, or current suicidal ideation would have excluded 86.4% of patients from an antidepressant efficacy trial. Conclusions: Subjects treated in efficacy trials of antidepressant medications represent only a small minority of patients treated for major depressive disorder in a routine clinical psychiatry practice. These results highlight that antidepressant efficacy trials tend to evaluate a small subset of depressed individuals with a very specific clinical profile. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Back